Posted At: July 1, 2008 1:15 PM Posted By: John Walls, Vice President, Public Affairs, CTIA - The Wireless Association® Related Categories:
Antenna & Tower Siting
So, you think you know your FCC Section 106, do you? Ok, tell me this--- When does a carrier's or tower owner's Section 106 issue become a Section 110(k) problem? Well? Not so easy, huh? Maybe all you need is a little brushing up on the tower rules, since it’s been four years since the commission implemented the National Programmatic Agreement. That’s why CTIA thought the the time was right for a tutorial on the ins and outs of tower siting, and put together this week’s Section 106 Refresher Course at the CTIA offices.
The day-and-a-half program hosted last Thursday and Friday, and focused on making Section 106 as efficient as possible while preserving historic sites around the country. As the number of US wireless subscribers continues to grow and the demand for services increases, there’s never been a greater need for superior coverage. Tower siting is obviously a central piece of that puzzle, and the role consultants play in the process is vital. That was a point of emphasis during the session, as attendees were also reminded of the varied levels of consultants’ training and expertise, and the key part they play in Section 106 implementation.
Please upgrade your Flash Player.
The multimedia content on this page requires installation of Flash Player 8 or higher.
Please download the latest Flash Player from the Adobe Website to enjoy all of the latest CTIA.org multimedia content.
If your settings indicate that you have Flash Player 8 or higher installed and you are still seeing this message, please try uninstalling and reinstalling the Flash Player plugin.
I think the beauty of the standing-room only sessions was the participation of the primary stakeholders: government, tribal, and industry representatives collaborated on presenting information integral to understanding the process and making it work as well as possible. Attendees were reminded of the crucial interaction between tower owners, consultants, SHPOs, THPOs, the FCC, and the AHCP, and were able to test drive the FCC’s new electronic Section 106 system. The information is extremely useful for those on the front line of tower siting, as they received practical guidance and advice on how to work within the system, while making the system work for them.
Those were just some of the highlights, and we believe this session was a valuable step toward extending coverage, and reinforces the need for all of the stakeholders to communicate so that nearly 260 million US wireless subscribers can do the same. Oh… that question about the Section 110 (k) problem… well, that happens when one of the stakeholders, i.e., SHPO/THPO, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP), a potentially affected Indian Tribe or Native Hawaiian Organization, or member of the public files a Section 110(k) petition with the FCC against the Applicant. But, of course, you knew that already.
How about providing links to the FCC rules in question so we can read them and become better informed about the rules? I for one want to see MORE towers--I don't care if they're hidden.
Thanks for your comment, Phoneboy. The FCC has dedicated a section of its web site to a number of tower siting topics, and I hope this helps you and all of our readers get caught up on its rules and regs. You can find the information at http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/environment/