4. Thirteen years ago Congress took a bold step and created a competitive
     telecommunications sector for the first time. Looking back on the Omnibus Budget
    Reconciliation Act of 1993 and the way it allowed wireless to evolve, what were your
    expectations and how do you see the results as they stand today?
   I believed that legislation would have a huge impact on communications and it
   has. The original CBO estimate was that spectrum auctions would only raise
   $250 million, and that was considered optimistic in some quarters. After the first
   auction which raised billions, I called (former Federal Communications
   Commission Chairman) Reed Hundt over at the FCC and asked if the agency
   had the federal program in place that gives employees a share of money the
   government saves generated by a suggestion from a federal employee. He said
   they did, so I asked if I was eligible. He laughed, but it tells you how successful
   the program has become.

5. So what about tomorrow for wireless? What, if anything, can Congress do to allow
    the wireless industry to provide even more innovative products and services for
   American consumers and businesses?
  Setting a specific date to auction the DTV spectrum is a great step forward. It will
  make the best spectrum available to the wireless industry to deploy 3G and other
  services. Another thing Congress can do is pass S.2686, the communications bill
  Senator Inouye and I introduced. This bill contains provisions to allow the   
  wireless industry to use “white spaces,” the vacant TV channels not currently in
  use.

6. Is there a danger in patchwork activity aimed at wireless at the state legislative and
    regulatory level, and where does Congress come in to that equation?
   Inconsistent state laws and regulations could have a negative impact on the
   wireless industry. Our bill, S. 2389, addressed this point, creating a national
   standard to protect the privacy of cell phone records. It preempts state laws that
   would be inconsistent with the national standard.

7. It’s been estimated by a leading analyst group that over the next 10 years wireless 
   will create up to three million new jobs, add an additional $410 billion to our Gross
   Domestic Product, and save U.S. businesses about $600 billion. What’s your reaction 
   when you hear those kinds of metrics?

  That is the best testimony we could have that the communications policies this
  Committee articulated in the past worked. But we need to remain vigilant and
  make sure that our laws evolve as the technology does. Net neutrality is a good
  example. We don’t want to unduly hamper new technologies or deployment of
  new facilities through overly rigorous regulation.



Senator Stevens discusses the proceedings of a Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee hearing with colleague and Committee Co-Chair Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii).
 




Pages:   1,   2,   3